Lifeless Island 2: Laptop computer and desktop benchmarks – NotebookCheck.web Evaluations

Zombie invasion in a fairly setting. Lifeless Island 2 won’t be the perfect recreation of the yr, however the combination of splatter motion and dignified Hollywood environment undoubtedly has its enchantment. You will discover the {hardware} necessities in our benchmark examine.

-Commercial-

Dead Island 2

We’re at the moment operating our gaming benchmarks with these laptops. Clicking on the pictures will take you to the respective producer’s homepage. All different check programs (tower PCs, mini PCs, …) are listed on the finish of the article.

Due to the easy-going entry and the intuitive controls, Lifeless Island 2 manages to captivate gamers rapidly.

The primary-person title additionally has loads to supply graphically. The American (hilly) landscapes, wherein Lifeless Island 2 is ready, shine amongst different issues with a excessive stage of foresight, fancy buildings, and lots of particulars – be it inside or exterior. The character fashions and the consequences (smoke, sparks, and many others.) are additionally spectacular. Minor graphics and clipping errors, which we encountered in the midst of the check, usually are not an enormous drawback total.

The graphics menu additionally hardly must be criticized both. Modifications are utilized with out a restart and there are quick explanations for the person settings. Whereas the decision, image mode, VSync, most body charge, the sector of view, movement blur, and brightness (SDR or HDR) may be adjusted within the show tab, over 10 element choices are ready within the prolonged menu, which may be globally adjusted through preset. Both FXAA or TAA is liable for edge smoothing. The AMD applied sciences FSR 2 and Variable Shading are on board. Particular Nvidia options like DLSS are lacking.

Technically, Lifeless Island 2 makes fairly a mature impression in relation to many different not too long ago launched video games when you disregard the occasional jerkiness, which might happen whatever the {hardware} efficiency and the chosen settings in our expertise. The truth that the shaders should be optimized at each recreation begin is just not noticeable as a result of quite quick period (no comparability to The Final of Us) particularly for the reason that intro movies may be skipped and the loading instances are pleasantly quick (not less than on SSDs).

Since Lifeless Island 2 doesn’t comprise an built-in benchmark, we use a specifically outlined sequence. After the tutorial, the principle character reaches the mansion of a well known Hollywood star and is allowed to maneuver round freed from zombies for some time, which advantages reproducible measurements and outcomes.

As you’ll be able to see within the following video, we run with the character for a great 20 seconds by way of the trendy mansion, the place there are additionally a couple of different characters. The body charge is recorded with the CapFrameX software. Since it is a fast-paced title from the first-person perspective, the common framerate must be not less than at a stage of 40 and even higher 60 FPS.

We’d describe the graphics necessities of Lifeless Island 2 as reasonable. With an iGPU on the extent of the Intel Iris Graphics G7, you must restrict your self to 1,280 x 720 pixels and minimal settings (simply over 50 FPS), however with stronger iGPUs just like the Radeon 680M, then again, usable body charges are additionally attainable in 1,920 x 1,080 (approx. 60 FPS @Low, approx. 40 FPS @Excessive). Solely ranging from the Extremely preset and onwards a devoted mid-range GPU is completely needed.

    1920×1080 Low Preset AA:Low T     1920×1080 Medium Preset AA:Excessive T     1920×1080 Excessive Preset AA:Excessive T     1920×1080 Extremely Preset AA:Excessive T
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, i9-12900K
Desktop-PC




299 (132.4min, 152.1P0.1, 206P1) fps ∼62%




265 (109.5min, 132.8P0.1, 174.1P1) fps ∼64%




250 (20.3min, 22.6P0.1, 159.1P1) fps ∼63%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-12900K
Desktop-PC




265 (58.5min, 147.4P0.1, 183.5P1) fps ∼55%




230 (86.1min, 140.7P0.1, 164.1P1) fps ∼55%




229 (117.4min, 125.2P0.1, 152.6P1) fps ∼58%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop computer GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 17 E23




225 (100.6min, 124.6P0.1, 146.9P1) fps ∼47%




207 (106.9min, 116.6P0.1, 144.4P1) fps ∼50%




206 (98min, 108.9P0.1, 138.3P1) fps ∼52%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop computer GPU, i9-13900HX
Schenker Key 17 Professional E23




219 (70.7min, 116.9P0.1, 145P1) fps ∼46%




206 (76.8min, 104.9P0.1, 140.5P1) fps ∼50%




201 (103.5min, 108.6P0.1, 119.9P1) fps ∼51%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop computer GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Professional 15 E23




209 (66.6min, 112.1P0.1, 149.5P1) fps ∼44%




170.3 (85.4min, 95P0.1, 124.6P1) fps ∼41%




158.8 (20.9min, 22P0.1, 116.7P1) fps ∼40%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop computer GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Focus 15 E23




192.8 (107.9min, 122.1P0.1, 140.1P1) fps ∼40%




142.3 (9.31min, 34.4P0.1, 105.5P1) fps ∼34%




133.5 (20.9min, 22.8P0.1, 101.6P1) fps ∼34%

AMD Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14




177.4 (82.1min, 88.4P0.1, 125.4P1) fps ∼68%




162.5 (11.9min, 80.2P0.1, 103.4P1) fps ∼34%




134.3 (57.8min, 74.3P0.1, 99.4P1) fps ∼32%




122.9 (12.2min, 12.4P0.1, 86.5P1) fps ∼31%

AMD Radeon 680M, R9 6900HS
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14




62.4 (32min, 32.5P0.1, 34.3P1) fps ∼24%




51.6 (12min, 14.2P0.1, 26.2P1) fps ∼11%




39.5 (14.9min, 17.4P0.1, 20.9P1) fps ∼9%




32.4 (7.38min, 7.91P0.1, 13.5P1) fps ∼8%

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7
Zotac ZBOX CI665 Nano




29 (5min, 7.46P0.1, 17.3P1) fps ∼11%




23.3 (3.18min, 3.29P0.1, 4.69P1) fps ∼5%




17.9 (9.35min, 9.4P0.1, 10.3P1) fps ∼4%




15.9 (6.97min, 7.08P0.1, 8.73P1) fps ∼4%

2,560 x 1,440 pixels demand a bit extra from the graphics card, though a fairly up-to-date mid-range GPU is enough right here as effectively (we decided greater than 70 FPS with the RTX 4050 at most settings).

    2560×1440 Extremely Preset AA:Excessive T
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, i9-12900K
Desktop-PC




231 (107.5min, 124.2P0.1, 166.5P1) fps ∼61%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-12900K
Desktop-PC




227 (88.9min, 97.8P0.1, 136P1) fps ∼60%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop computer GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 17 E23




198.2 (65.9min, 119.5P0.1, 135.3P1) fps ∼52%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop computer GPU, i9-13900HX
Schenker Key 17 Professional E23




172.1 (94.8min, 114P0.1, 132.1P1) fps ∼45%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop computer GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Professional 15 E23




101.9 (47.8min, 58.8P0.1, 67.3P1) fps ∼27%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop computer GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Focus 15 E23




76.5 (5.62min, 6.51P0.1, 24.3P1) fps ∼20%

The {hardware} necessities within the 4K sector are additionally not overly excessive. Even a GeForce RTX 4050 (with a excessive TGP) cracks the 40 FPS mark at most particulars.

    3840×2160 Extremely Preset AA:Excessive T
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, i9-12900K
Desktop-PC




129.3 (71.9min, 74P0.1, 85.7P1) fps ∼40%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-12900K
Desktop-PC




123.7 (73.2min, 74.7P0.1, 84.7P1) fps ∼38%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop computer GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 17 E23




101.2 (39.3min, 44.9P0.1, 66.6P1) fps ∼31%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop computer GPU, i9-13900HX
Schenker Key 17 Professional E23




82.1 (36.4min, 42.2P0.1, 50.7P1) fps ∼25%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop computer GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Professional 15 E23




47.4 (23min, 24.4P0.1, 26.8P1) fps ∼15%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop computer GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Focus 15 E23




40.8 (14.6min, 16.7P0.1, 21.5P1) fps ∼13%

Since gaming assessments are very time-consuming and sometimes restricted by set up or activation limits, we will solely give you part of the benchmarks on the time of publication. We will likely be including extra graphics playing cards within the coming days and weeks.

(-) * Smaller values are higher. / n123 Variety of benchmarks for this median worth / * Approximate place

Legend
5 Stutters – This recreation may be very prone to stutter and have poor body charges. Based mostly on all identified benchmarks utilizing the required graphical settings, common body charges are anticipated to fall beneath 25fps
Might Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly examined on this recreation. Based mostly on interpolated data from surrounding graphics playing cards of comparable efficiency ranges, stutters and poor body charges are anticipated.
30 Fluent – Based mostly on all identified benchmarks utilizing the required graphical settings, this recreation ought to run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based mostly on all identified benchmarks utilizing the required graphical settings, this recreation ought to run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based mostly on all identified benchmarks utilizing the required graphical settings, this recreation ought to run at or above 58fps
Might Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly examined on this recreation. Based mostly on interpolated data from surrounding graphics playing cards of comparable efficiency ranges, fluent body charges are anticipated.
? Unsure – This graphics card skilled sudden efficiency points throughout testing for this recreation. A slower card could possibly obtain higher and extra constant body charges than this explicit GPU operating the identical benchmark scene.
Unsure – This graphics card has not been explicitly examined on this recreation and no dependable interpolation may be made based mostly on the performances of surrounding playing cards of the identical class or household.
The worth within the fields shows the common body charge of all values within the database. Transfer your cursor over the worth to see particular person outcomes.

 Cns

4K Screens Working System Nvidia Driver AMD Driver
Philips Brilliance 329P9H, Gigabyte M32U Home windows 11 ForceWare 531.79 Adrenalin 23.4.3