Supreme Court docket nominee and US Circuit Court docket Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Capitol Hill in Washington, October 21, 2020.
Ken Cedeno | Reuters
A federal prosecutor withdrew her identify from working for a seat on the Connecticut Supreme Court docket on Friday after lawmakers rejected a 2017 letter she signed in assist of Amy Coney Barrett, who’s now the Supreme Court docket Justice USA is.
Gov. Ned Lamont’s nomination of Sandra Slack Glover fell by in current days as a result of she had beforehand endorsed Barrett for a seat on the US Circuit Court docket’s seventh Circuit — 5 years earlier than Barrett’s Supreme Court docket vote to abolish it Federal regulation offered for abortion.
The fitting to abortion is enshrined in Connecticut regulation. The state expanded entry to abortion following final summer season’s controversial determination by the US Supreme Court docket in Dobbs v. Jackson Girls’s Well being Group.
Glover, who described herself as a staunch supporter of abortion rights, mentioned Monday throughout her testimony earlier than the Connecticut Senate Judiciary Committee that signing the letter in assist of Barrett was “naïve” and “unsuitable”.
“Wanting again and figuring out what I do know now, I shouldn’t have signed it,” Glover testified of the letter, which was signed by each clerk for the U.S. Supreme Court docket who served throughout that courtroom’s 1998-1999 time period was.
On the time, Glover was serving as clerk for Justice Sandra Day O’Connor throughout that time period, and Barrett was clerk for the late Justice Antonin Scalia.
Learn extra about CNBC’s political protection:
Glover mentioned Monday that the US Supreme Court docket’s determination in 2022 to rule out the 50-year-old Roe v. selecting up Wade was “unsuitable and outrageous.”
“Talking as a lady was terrifying,” mentioned Glover, chief of appeals on the US Legal professional’s workplace in Connecticut.
“We must always all have the constitutional proper to manage our reproductive freedom and our our bodies,” she testified. “My perception in that is agency and unshakable.”
Regardless of her statements that day, key Democratic and Republican Judiciary Committee members predicted Tuesday that her nomination wouldn’t be authorised, information web site CTMirror.com reported. The committee declined to vote on her nomination after Monday’s seven-hour listening to.
“I see no actual path ahead for this specific candidate,” mentioned Enfield Senator John Kissel, chief Republican on the committee, in line with CTMirror. “The votes for her aren’t even near double digits.”